Page and figure references are from the English Penguin Books edition, unless otherwise noted.
- Is there any way to make any sense of the ATTACCA sequence, using Typogenetics? At a first look, it would generate:
ATTACCA --> AT TA CC A
swi rpy mvl
The tertiary structure reveals that the typoenzyme would prefer G:s -
and so it wouldn't do anything with the strand. Any better approach? - In Dialogue IX, Achilles spoke of feeling "so guilty about violating the Central Dogma" when making a koan out of a folded string (i e, reversing the translation). Are we to understand that the same holds for molecular miology - that in some way you may not (can't) derive a DNA from a particular protein?